Friday, October 16, 2026 Edition: Raleigh 73° Clear WATCH LIVE Sign in Subscribe
Genius Eye News
See the move first
Advertise in every cityLeaderboard and city takeovers. Book online in minutes.
MARKETS + HEADLINES
Sacramento

Less than half of California students meet English standards, math scores also low

Only 49.3% of California students met English standards and 38.4% met math standards in 2025-26, highlighting educational challenges.

Oct 16, 2026, 6:18 AM By the Genius Eye newsroom (City Reporter) · Fact-checkedHow we report
Photo: J.smith / CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

A recent report highlighted that only 49.3% of California students met or exceeded English language arts standards during the 2025-26 school year, while just 38.4% met math standards, according to CityWatch LA.

The report described these figures not as mere disappointments but as an educational emergency, noting only slight improvements from the previous year: English proficiency rose by 0.5 percentage points and math by 1.1 percentage points.

Despite California spending approximately $134 billion on K-12 education in 2025-26—about $26,450 per student—the results remain unsatisfactory, especially for economically disadvantaged students. Around 61.1% of these students did not meet English standards and 72.6% fell short in math.

The report emphasized that this issue is not an attack on teachers, who often work under challenging conditions, but rather a call for accountability from decision-makers at the highest levels regarding the effectiveness of education spending.

The findings raise concerns about the future readiness of California's youth and the widening educational gaps affecting disadvantaged communities, underscoring the need for urgent attention and action in the state's education system.

Sources
  1. citywatchla.com: CityWatch LA - California Is Failing My Generation . The Test Scores Are the Proof
We read public reporting and official data, confirm what we can, and write our own story. See something wrong? Request a correction.

Comments

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment